With a name like “Nobama”, you might want to consider how you respond to people who don’t see it YOUR way. But, anyway…
The older gentleman (and I use that very loosely) posing the question started all this by bringing the idea of peeing into the discussion in the first place. He could have made his point without being vulgar and resorting to name calling. The woman who asked questions later did so in a much more civil manner. But what many of the teabaggers and Obama protestors don’t seem to understand is that trying to belittle somebody with names and insults will only lead to responses in kind (i.e. Barney Frank)
Flip this around. If this was a liberal protestor and a Republican congressman…with the SAME exchange about Bush, would you libs be cheering? Didn’t think so.
What planet are you two idiots from? For one, NOBODY is saying people don’t have a right to protest something they don’t believe it. What makes you and your ilk pathetic is that you’re protesting health care plans that will benefit your dumb asses. Secondly, just in case you didn’t see the clip, the old man started it. As another poster said, you come at me with name-calling, insults, and vitriol, don’t be suprised to get that same response flung back at you. Finally, comparing THIS to Joe “The South Shall Riiiiise Again” Wilson? Are you flipping kidding me?! This wasn’t during a nationally televised address to Congress. This wasn’t in the middle of one of the most civil Congressional exchanges of the year. This was a town hall meeting, populated by ignoramuses like you.
The Unmitigated Word 
What can I say? Sometimes this is the kind of language you have to use for these kind of people.
Note: Never oppose ideas from his O-ness. The Democrats hate anybody who doesn’t see things THEIR way.
With a name like “Nobama”, you might want to consider how you respond to people who don’t see it YOUR way. But, anyway…
The older gentleman (and I use that very loosely) posing the question started all this by bringing the idea of peeing into the discussion in the first place. He could have made his point without being vulgar and resorting to name calling. The woman who asked questions later did so in a much more civil manner. But what many of the teabaggers and Obama protestors don’t seem to understand is that trying to belittle somebody with names and insults will only lead to responses in kind (i.e. Barney Frank)
Flip this around. If this was a liberal protestor and a Republican congressman…with the SAME exchange about Bush, would you libs be cheering? Didn’t think so.
Amen! The libs will complain about Joe Wilson, but won’t say a thing about Pete Stark. A healthy dose of hypocrisy, anybody?
What planet are you two idiots from? For one, NOBODY is saying people don’t have a right to protest something they don’t believe it. What makes you and your ilk pathetic is that you’re protesting health care plans that will benefit your dumb asses. Secondly, just in case you didn’t see the clip, the old man started it. As another poster said, you come at me with name-calling, insults, and vitriol, don’t be suprised to get that same response flung back at you. Finally, comparing THIS to Joe “The South Shall Riiiiise Again” Wilson? Are you flipping kidding me?! This wasn’t during a nationally televised address to Congress. This wasn’t in the middle of one of the most civil Congressional exchanges of the year. This was a town hall meeting, populated by ignoramuses like you.
Don’t mention urinating too loudly. You might get R. Kelly in on the action. LOL!