Inauguration: The Day After

inauguration

Standing in freezing temperatures, jammed packed in the National Mall like sardines, and with feet swelling from standing in one place for hours, I finally heard the words I never thought I’d hear a person of color say in my lifetime: “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States…” Well, at least it went sort of like that. President Obama arguably pulled off the first Bushism of his tenure while initially stammering through the oath. But in his defense, it was ridiculously cold and he was in front of almost 2 million people in one place; let alone the tens – perhaps hundreds - of millions watching around the globe. The occasional nervous stammer is expected. But I digress.

One linguistic episode aside,  this inauguration ceremony reflects one of the most important moments in the history of this country. This moment is directly defiant to the shameful years of our past and is a signpost for a promising future. People of all ages, races, and backgrounds gathered to watch this event unfold; an event which emphatically closed the door on America’s once prevalent and adolescent mindset that only a certain kind of person could be President. Now being ushering in is a new wave of hope and confidence.

But now, it’s the day after. The confetti has been swept away. It’s back to work we go.

For us to truly recognize the significance of the day and of this time in our history, a different type of thinking and practice is necessary. For starters, this event must make us more conscious of the shameful history paving the way for us to arrive at this point. The process for putting a man like Barack Obama in this position did not start with the inaugural ceremonies. It did not start with an impressive Election Day victory. It did not start with Obama accepting his party’s nomination for President. His propellant victory in Iowa was not where the movement started. For that matter, not even Obama announcing his intentions to run on that cold day two years ago began this process. These moments merely underscored a chain of events tracing back decades.  The inauguration of President Obama was a fulfillment of entire centuries-worth of anonymous people not remembered in history books, but who were crucial to what we are enjoying today. They suffered, fought, and died for an event in which they would never take part. We owe this all to them by honoring them using a multipronged approach.

First as we commemorate this as a critical point in our nation’s maturation, it is important that this does not simply become the period at the end of a sentence. I pray that as a nation we do not allow Obama’s election to become the impetus for complacency. While I am thrilled that America has finally opened its arms to the reality of a person of color, it was certainly not an unconditional acceptance. I’ve hinted before that weight of an unpopular predecessor was carried by the McCain/Palin ticket; only to be magnified when the economy collapsed. At that point, an Obama victory was almost inevitable. Besides all of that, Obama had to be a certain kind of candidate during his run. Any endorsement of Jeremiah Wright’s statements, for instance (comments on which I and most black people in this country actually cosign to some extent) would have spelled immediate defeat in a general election. Though I suspect Obama truly wanted to find solvency with the issue of race by parting from the discussion altogether, had he even wanted to engage in some of the difficult conservations about this nation and race relations, McCain would have no doubt been the man being sworn in yesterday. This reality underscores an important point: we have progressed significantly with race relations, but we still have a long ways to go.

Secondly, I think it is crucial that we not get so effusively sentimental about Obama’s victory that we forget to be critical of his performance. The overwhelming issues facing this nation are only temporarily absolved by this euphoric moment. Poverty and economic hardships, violence, racism, homophobia, anti-intellectualism, and a host of other issues continue to be staples  in the American structure. Before victory can truly be claimed, these things must come to an end. What President Obama does to address these things will be the ultimate measure of this moments’ significance. In his defense, we tend to place blame on Presidents without also recognizing the role Congress plays. But with the supporting cast he has, President Obama has a lot working for him. But if he cannot produce positive results during his tenure, we may only be celebrating the historic election of a captain on a sinking ship.

Of course, we cannot lay this all at the feet of Obama alone. Challenging him to be an effective leader must be met with our own self-imposed challenge to be better citizens. As citizens, we have an obligation to be equally as critical of Obama’s performance as we were of President Bush’s. We must not be so enamored by the ceremoniousness of all things Obama that we forget he’s supposed to be our President. After all, we are fresh off the heels of a miserable decade in our political history that could have been avoided had we used sensible criticism of our President instead of mawkish adoration. This all demands that we not stay politically blinded until we vote again. This calls for something much greater than that.

This leads me to my final point: we should not find ourselves in the position of resting on our laurels now that Obama is officially president. Instead of wasting this opportunity by accepting a docile and unassuming role in the change we are seeking, we should make a conscious decision to be involved. The time for excuses is over. The time for action is now. To be sure, a history-making inauguration of the first president of color makes the challenges we face no less difficult to surmount. But it should at the very least trigger a belief that we can face and defeat the obstacles we face daily. We can all be a little more motivated to healing this world.

To volunteer.

To improve our communities.

To mentor our young.

To reach out to the poorest and more marginalized among us.

To exhibit the same pride and connection that allowed us to endure throughout the generations.

Our history has not culminated at this moment. If anything, this is only the next step in the process.

- ACL

  1. JJM
    January 21, 2009 at - | #1

    Nice post, sir Andre. You hit every major point I was thinking. While the election and the inauguration are important to the history of the country, they are not the signatures. There is more work to be done!

  2. GA girl
    January 22, 2009 at - | #2

    Not suprising, but another great post Andre!. I didn’t have the opportunity to make it to the inauguration. But friends and family who did attend said some of the same things you hinted to in this post. From what I hear there was definitely excitement in the air. Even watching it on television gave me a sense of excitement. But I also wonder how those same people will respond over the next four — possibly eight — years. I often wonder if accountability will be there for our next President. The boos from the crowd DEFINITELY told the story for the President before him. LOL!

  3. JJM
    January 22, 2009 at - | #3

    “The boos from the crowd DEFINITELY told the story for the President before him. LOL!”

    I caught that on MSNBC. Andre, was the booing as loud there as it was on TV?

  4. Megan
    January 22, 2009 at - | #4

    “Secondly, I think it is crucial that we not get so effusively sentimental about Obama’s victory that we forget to be critical of his performance. The overwhelming issues facing this nation are only temporarily absolved by this euphoric moment. Poverty and economic hardships, violence, racism, homophobia, anti-intellectualism, and a host of other issues continue to be staples in the American structure.”

    I know you’re ready to put on your criticism hat Andre, but how can you make these issues about how well Obama performs? While some things can be fixed with a piece of legislation, some things not even Obama can fix. I know he’s America’s annointed Savior and all, but aren’t you expecting too much from him…especially when the man JUST got sworn in (for the second time. LOL!)?

  5. Andre
    January 22, 2009 at - | #5

    @ GA girl: “But I also wonder how those same people will respond over the next four — possibly eight — years. I often wonder if accountability will be there for our next President.

    I’m not sure. I normally don’t like conceding points to the right, but I have a feeling that a large part of Obama’s Amen Corner – especially black folks – will offer neglect to offer the President a critical eye. “For good or for bad…” they’ll say. And while that’s good on one front, it makes President Obama seemingly untouchable. We’ve seen what happens when that’s the case with Presidents.

    @ JJM: “I caught that on MSNBC. Andre, was the booing as loud there as it was on TV?

    The booing was pretty loud in my area. But after checking out a clip from MSNBC, apparently a chant of “Na na na na, Na na na na. Hey, hey, hey, goodbye!” got started in the audience as well. Some people like Chris Matthews (of all people) said it was done in bad form. But what do you expect really?!

    @ Megan: I understand your point, but I don’t think I implied (at least not intentionally) that Obama’s magic hand would make many of the social and behavior ills vanish. Legislation can’t stop a person from having racist thoughts, for example.

    What I AM saying, however, is that as President he must get things done especially at the expense of shaking up the status quo. The ultimate point is this post was to challenge people NOT to let up on him or any other elected officials. The minute we do, they’ll let up.

  6. Josh
    January 22, 2009 at - | #6

    The criticism can start with the $170 million spent on the inauguration: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inauguration/story?id=6665946&page=1

  7. Andre
    January 22, 2009 at - | #7

    Josh, for once you and I actually agree on something. Now, to be fair: Obama certainly isn’t the first person to spend a ridiculous amount on an inauguration. And you also have to consider a few things: (1) most of the funds were privately donated and (2) the event drew almost five times as many people as Bush’s 2004 event.

    Still, I think that any leader who signs off on extravagent parties while his/her country is suffering deserves to get called out. For the parties, Obama could have easily had finger foods, lemon cake, and called it a day.

    This is a prime example of what I’m talking about when I say we need to hold our leaders – even those as adored as Obama – accountable.

  8. Anonymous
    January 22, 2009 at - | #8

    Josh/Andre, it costs more to get a GOOD president. When you pay less, you get cheaper quality.

  9. Kenya
    January 22, 2009 at - | #9

    Seriously. It this the new discussion?! I was prepared to comment about how great this piece was. But when I read some of the comments,

    Now I absolutely agree on one thing: when the folks in the media attacked Bush for spending excessive money on his festivities, they should also be critical of Obama.

    But…

    It’s clearly obvious that security and crowd control had a large part to do with the high price tag. Even before getting sworn in, Obama had received a record number of death threats. upon by supporters and detractors. I’d want a break out of security costs. If two million people ever came to see Bush, you could expect the $$$ spent to be pretty similar.

    The parties were a bit over the top, yes. But most of them were not even on the government’s dime. Most were sponsored by private donors. But even if it weren’t the case, are we so poor that we can’t enjoy one of the biggest moments in history even for one day? It is one extraordinary day in our lives. Let’s bask in it for a moment and not diminish its value. Besides all of that, I’m sure the businesses in DC aren’t exactly feeling the sting of having 2 million people plus giving them business.

  10. January 23, 2009 at - | #10

    About the oath: Chief Justice John Roberts was the first to stumble on the oath. I think he should have had a script instead of relying on memory. But I don’t think the misstep was that big of a deal. Obama recovered smoothly, as he always does.

    Nice post. Your closing words remind me of a favorite Obama quote.

  11. Andre
    January 23, 2009 at - | #11

    Kenya, I’m feeling you on the security and crowd control; though I’m not convinced – after dealing with those crowds – that money was well spent. But security was definitely jam packed. Snipers on rooftops, secret service men all around the mall. The millions spent in that regard were worth every penny.

    @ Deb: Thanks for the clarification about C.J. Roberts. When I watching it on the Jumbotron, Roberts’ mic wasn’t as loud as Obama’s (not sure if that was an accident or if I was just paying more attention to Obama). When I originally wrote this post, it was before I saw the viral clips of it. From what I saw in person, it looked like Obama.

    Thanks again for making the correction.

    Awesome quote, by the way. Thanks for blessing me with that.

  1. No trackbacks yet.